How well did we meet the sprint goal?
A rating the team can track from one sprint to the next, provided the wording stays the same.
A sprint retrospective survey collects the team's view of the sprint before the meeting, so that quieter people can contribute and the discussion starts from patterns rather than memory. Ask about the sprint and its process, not about individuals, and keep the same questions each time so the answers can be compared. The meeting then turns the themes into one or two actions with owners.
Sprint retrospective: 1,000 average monthly searches.Google Ads Keyword Planner · 2026-10-09 · United States
A rating the team can track from one sprint to the next, provided the wording stays the same.
Protects the practices the team depends on, which otherwise get changed without anyone deciding to change them.
Names the friction. Ask about the work, the handoffs and the process, so the answers describe the system rather than a person.
Shows whether unfinished work came from the plan or from the execution of it.
A single change can be tested in the next sprint. Several changes at once cannot show which one helped.
| Field | Type | Required | Why you ask it |
|---|---|---|---|
Sprint name or numberFor example: Sprint 14 | Short text | Required | Ties the answers to one sprint so that trends can be read later. |
How well did we meet the sprint goal?Not at allPartlyMostlyFully | Single choice | Required | The same rating every sprint, so the team can see movement over time. |
What went well? | Long text | Optional | Things to keep. Asking for what worked first gives the team something to build on before the harder answers. |
What slowed the sprint down? | Long text | Required | The friction the team wants to address. Ask about the work and the process, not about a named person. |
How clear were the priorities?Very unclearUnclearMixedClearVery clear | Single choice | Required | Separates a planning problem from an execution problem before the meeting starts. |
One change to try next sprint | Long text | Required | A single change is testable. Several changes at once cannot show which one helped. |
Anything you would rather raise privately | Long text | Optional | A place for points that are hard to raise in a group. Read it before the meeting, and speak to the writer first if they gave a name. |
Your name (optional) | Short text | Optional | Lets the facilitator follow up on a point. Leave it blank if you want fewer identifying details, knowing that a small team can still recognize a writer by wording. |
Read the answers and sort them into a few themes. Put the themes on the agenda, so the group discusses the pattern rather than reading every answer aloud.
A theme raised by one person can still matter, but a theme raised by most of the team is the one to discuss first. Count the mentions rather than weighing the loudest voice.
Pick actions the team can finish in the next sprint, name one owner for each, and check them at the start of the next retrospective.
Because the questions repeat, you can see whether the goal rating or the priority rating is moving across sprints. One sprint on its own tells you very little.
Who missed the deadline turns a retrospective into a performance review, and people stop writing honest answers. Ask about the work, the handoffs and the process.
Notifications follow the hourly processing run in production. Send the form a day before, so the facilitator has read the answers when the meeting begins.
A long form with several open boxes can get thinner answers and a slower read. Keep it to the questions you will work through before the meeting.
A name field can be left blank, but a team of six can still tell who wrote a sentence. Say who will read the answers, and do not call the form anonymous.
A retrospective that produces a list but no action can teach the team to stop answering. Record the chosen actions where the team tracks its work, and report what happened to last sprint's actions first.
Ask how well the sprint goal was met, what went well, what slowed the work down, how clear the priorities were, and what one change to try next. Keep the same questions each sprint, so the answers can be compared over time.
No. A retrospective needs a short set of questions, a meeting, and an owner for each action. This form collects the input before the meeting. Attain OS builds it as a link the team answers on a web page, and it does not replace the discussion.
The name field is optional, so you do not have to collect names. A team small enough to run a retrospective can still recognize a writer from the wording, so do not call the form anonymous. Tell the team who will read the answers before the meeting, and keep that promise.
Send it at least a day before the meeting. The form's creator hears about each response only after the hourly processing run in production, so a reply sent minutes before the meeting may arrive too late to read.
Choose a category and a form type in the wizard. Answer three Atty Suggestions questions, then give the form a title. Atty builds the fields in the background. Edit the fields and ask Atty to refine them, then publish and share the /f/ link.