How well did you meet the goals agreed at the start of this review period?
Anchors the rating to goals both people can see, not to general impressions of the period.
A performance review form asks a manager or employee to rate observable work against goals agreed earlier, then to explain the rating in their own words. Use the same questions and scale each cycle so the results can be compared. The form records assessments; it does not set pay, decide promotions, or replace the review conversation.
Performance review form: 210 average monthly searches.Google Ads Keyword Planner · 2026-10-09 · United States
Performance review template: 4,400 average monthly searches.Google Ads Keyword Planner · 2026-10-09 · United States
Anchors the rating to goals both people can see, not to general impressions of the period.
Surfaces planning and workload problems that a rating alone would hide.
Checks whether the employee had what they needed to meet expectations before the result is judged.
Gives the development plan a specific starting point instead of a general goal.
Turns the review into a short list of decisions the manager can actually make.
| Field | Type | Required | Why you ask it |
|---|---|---|---|
Employee name | Short text | Required | Keeps one record per person and period, which a later comparison depends on. |
Role and team | Short text | Required | Lets reviewers compare people in similar roles. Use the job title from your HR records. |
Review periodFor example: January to June 2026. | Short text | Required | States the dates the goals cover, so the rating is about that period only. |
Who is completing this formEmployee (self-assessment)Manager (assessment of a direct report) | Single choice | Required | Separates a self-assessment from a manager's assessment, so the two views are not blended into one score. |
Overall rating for goalsRate against the goals written into the review, not against colleagues. Not metPartly metMetExceeded | Single choice | Required | Gives the headline result. The questions above explain what drove it. |
Accomplishments in this period | Long text | Optional | Records specific work that supports the rating, with dates or outcomes where you have them. |
Areas to improveDescribe what to do differently, not what kind of person to be. | Long text | Optional | Names one or two changes the person can act on. General descriptions of character are not actionable. |
Development goal for the next period | Long text | Optional | Turns the feedback into a goal someone can check at the next review. |
Employee comments | Long text | Optional | Lets the employee respond in writing to the manager's view before the review is final. |
Date of the review conversation | Date | Optional | Records when the two people discussed the review. This is separate from the date the form was submitted. |
Use the CSV export to place the self-assessment and the manager's assessment for each employee in adjacent columns. The form does not compare the two for you.
A large difference between self and manager ratings is the subject of the conversation. Ask each person what evidence they used before deciding which view is more accurate.
With four categories, an average hides how the ratings are spread. Report how many people fell into each category instead.
Record the development goal and the support the manager will provide in a separate note. A completed form is not yet a plan.
The form records an assessment. Pay and promotion decisions belong to your compensation process, under a standard applied consistently across managers. Write down what each rating means, so two managers mean the same thing by Met.
Words like attitude or fit describe no behavior the employee can change. Write what the person did and what it led to, so they know what to keep doing and what to change.
Recent events often weigh more heavily in memory than earlier ones. Ask the manager to list examples from across the review period before choosing a rating.
If the agreed goals are not written into the introduction, the rating can only be about impressions. Copy the goals into the introduction before you publish.
This page gives the questions and the scale for an online form. No Word or PDF file is produced, so copy the list into your own document if you need one.
A template is a document you fill in under the same headings each cycle. A form collects answers through a link, which makes it easier to compare responses across people and periods. Either works if the questions and the scale stay the same.
Include enough questions to cover goals, strengths, gaps, and development, and no more. The blueprint above has ten fields, which suits an annual review. A mid-year check-in can use fewer.
A self-assessment shows the employee's view before the conversation starts. Keep it on a separate copy from the manager's assessment, so the two can be compared as described in the reading notes.
Choose a cycle your organization can keep, such as an annual review with a mid-year check-in. Use the same questions each time, because a change in wording makes results hard to compare.
Choose a category and a form type in the wizard. Answer three Atty Suggestions questions, then give the form a title. Atty builds the fields in the background. Edit the fields and ask Atty to refine them, then publish and share the /f/ link.